Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Mario Ruvalcaba Ortega et al v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04276
Plaintiff:
Mario Ruvalcaba Ortega and Beatriz A. Ruvalcaba Tabarez
Defendant:
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
USA v. Joaquin Cipriano-Ortega
as 19-50090
Defendant / Appellant:
JOAQUIN MARIO CIPRIANO-ORTEGA, AKA Mario Cipriano-Ortega
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Vargas Garcia et al v. Park et al
as 1:2018cv10650
Plaintiff:
Abel Reyes Damian, Julian Jacobo Garcia, Jorge Pedro Estrada Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
C and J Brothers, Inc., Chang Y Park and Matthew Park
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ortega et al v. Velez-Amador et al
as 3:2018cv01236
Plaintiff:
Mario R. Ortega , Argyro Ortega , Anthony G. Ortega and others
Defendant:
Ricardo Velez-Amador, Gabriela Agullo-Pagan, Vessel Andrea Gabriela, official number PR5158CC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018at00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
USA v. Edgar Juarez-Ortega
as 15-40657
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EDGAR JUAREZ-ORTEGA, also known as Mario Juarez-Ortega
Pilia-Ortega v. SNC Investments, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv08855
Plaintiff:
Mario Pilia-Ortega
Defendant:
SNC Investments, LLC and Sameh Nawar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Mario Ortega v. Corcoran State Prison
as 10-17016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO TIMMOTHY ORTEGA
Defendant - Appellee:
CORCORAN STATE PRISON
Mario Ortega v. Corcoran State Prison
as 10-16733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO TIMMOTHY ORTEGA
Defendant - Appellee:
CORCORAN STATE PRISON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
