Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Acebedo et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company LLC et al
as 4:2020cv01714
Plaintiff:
Nestor Antonio Tovar, Stephen T. Hillman, Gonzalo Vallejo Maldonado and others
Defendant:
Intercontinental Terminals Company LLC, Instrumentation & Electrical Specialist, LLC, CIMA Services, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mario Alberto Rodriguez v. W. Montgomery
as 8:2019cv02093
Respondent:
W. Montgomery
Petitioner:
Mario Alberto Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez v. The United States of America
as 3:2018cv00382
Respondent:
The United States of America
Petitioner:
Mario Alberto Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rodriguez-Briones v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2017cv00149
Plaintiff:
Mario Alberto Rodriguez-Briones
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rodriguez v. Stephens
as 5:2015cv00274
Petitioner:
Mario Alberto Rodriguez
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Salinas v. City of Socorro, Texas
as 3:2015cv00243
Plaintiff:
Bernardo Salinas and Mario Alberto Rodriguez
Defendant:
City of Socorro, Texas
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Mario Rodriguez Curiel, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-71176
Petitioner:
MARIO ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ CURIEL and NORMA SILVA GONZALEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Rodriguez v. Santa Clara County Main Jail
as 5:2012cv04028
Plaintiff:
Mario Alberto Rodriguez
Defendant:
Santa Clara County Main Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. Santa Clara County-Main Jail
as 3:2012cv04033
Plaintiff:
Mario Alberto Rodriguez
Defendant:
Santa Clara County-Main Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Santa Clara County Main Jail
as 5:2012cv04031
Plaintiff:
Mario Alberto Rodriguez
Defendant:
Santa Clara County Main Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
