Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,233
Owour v. Garland
as 24-2827
Petitioner: OSBERT MARION OTIEN OWOUR
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00406
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Marion Taylor
as 24-1659
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: MARION D. TAYLOR
Disability Rights Oregon, et al. v. Allen, et al.
as 24-2229
Plaintiff: DISABILITY RIGHTS OREGON, fka Oregon Advocacy Center, METROPOLITAN PUBLIC DEFENDER and A. J. MADISON
Defendant: PATRICK ALLEN, Director of the Department of Human Services, in his official capacity and DOLORES MATTEUCCI, Superintendent of Oregon State Hospital, in her official capacity
Other: COUNTY OF MARION, Proposed Intervenor
Boersma v. Armstrong
as 24-2090
Plaintiff: HEATHER LYNN BOERSMA
Defendant: SEAN ARMSTRONG, Marion County Circuit Court Judge
Sohovich v. Avalara, Inc., et al.
as 24-1646
Plaintiff: MARTIN SOHOVICH, On behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant: AVALARA, INC., SCOTT MCFARLANE, BRUCE CRAWFORD and others
Peck v. Nelson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff: Marcus LaShawn Peck
Defendant: William J Nelson and Marion County Prosecutor's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duell Family Trust et al v. Ford et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff: Duell Family Trust and Todd Alan Duell
Defendant: Gosch Ford, Matt Gosch, Ford Motor Credit Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00038
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
In re: Marion Brewster
as 24-109
Petitioner: In re: MARION QUINTON BREWSTER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?