Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ellis v. Atencio et al
as 1:2017cv00106
Petitioner:
Mark Lee Ellis
Respondent:
Henry Atencio and Lawrence Wasden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America v. Mark T. Ellis
as 8:2013cv01829
Defendant:
Mark T Ellis
Petitioner:
United States of America
United States of America v. Ellis
as 6:2011cv06321
Defendant:
Mark T. Ellis
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Ellis et al v. Robinson et al
as 6:2009cv06067
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Ellis and Susan D Ellis
Defendant:
Ron W. Robinson, Internal Revenue Service and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Angel Acquisition Corp et al
as 8:2008cv00880
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission and others
Defendant:
Angel Acquisition Corp, Marshall Holdings International Inc, NW Tech Capital Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Madden, et al v. Cowen & Company, et al
as 07-15900
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES T. MADDEN, SHASHIDHAR ACHARYA, M.D., ACHAUER FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a limited partnership and others
Defendant / Appellee:
COWEN & COMPANY, a New York limited partnership, SG COWEN SECURITIES CORPORATION, a New York corporation and COWEN & COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Madden, et al v. Cowen & Company, et al
as 07-15900
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES T. MADDEN, SHASHIDHAR ACHARYA, M.D., ACHAUER FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a limited partnership and others
Defendant - Appellee:
COWEN & COMPANY, a New York limited partnership, SG COWEN SECURITIES CORPORATION, a New York corporation and COWEN & COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
