Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Bell v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv50163
Plaintiff:
Mark S. Bell
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bell v. David Carter Photo Co
as 3:2023cv01891
Petitioner:
Mark Lyle Bell
Respondent:
David Carter Photo Co and Unknown Associates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. David Carter Photo Co.
as 5:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Mark Lyle Bell
Defendant:
David Carter Photo Co. and Unknown Associates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Kei Crus, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02151
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Warner-Tamerlane Publishing Corp, Crompton Songs and others
Defendant:
Kei Crus, Inc., Mark Thomas Bell, Mark Mueller and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Bell v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00068
Petitioner:
Mark Lyle Bell
Defendant:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Director Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID and Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bell v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2022cv00025
Petitioner:
Mark Lyle Bell
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bell v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00101
Petitioner:
Mark Lyle Bell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hoskins v. Chapman et al
as 3:2021cv00620
Defendant:
C. Heck, Treg Vanderkhove, Mark A. Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Brock et al
as 3:2020cv00788
Defendant:
C. Heck, Lieutenant Miller, Officer Bailey and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Swisher et al
as 3:2020cv00395
Defendant:
Larue Love, Mr. Ren, Mr. Bedford and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
