Cases 1 - 10 of 31
NIXON v. ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK (DENTIST) et al
as 2:2023cv01806
Plaintiff:
MARK A. NIXON
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK (DENTIST), (ACTING) WARDEN ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL WARDEN, DOUG WILLIAMS (CEO) RENEWAL INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
NIXON v. ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK et al
as 2:2023cv01805
Plaintiff:
MARK A. NIXON
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK, JANE DOE, ALLEGHENY COUNTY DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
NIXON v. HARPER
as 2:2023cv01694
Petitioner:
MARK A. NIXON
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
NIXON v. HARPER et al
as 2:2019cv00602
Defendant:
ORLANDO HARPER, JOHN I DOE, C.O. JACKSON and others
Plaintiff:
MARK A. NIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
NIXON v. HARPER
as 2:2019cv00583
Respondent:
WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER
Petitioner:
MARK A. NIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NIXON v. HARPER et al
as 2:2019cv00353
Defendant:
ORLANDO HARPER, JOHN DOE #1, C.O. JACKSON and others
Plaintiff:
MARK A. NIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Mark Nixon v. Warden Allegheny County Jail, et al
as 19-1299
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY, WARDEN ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK A. NIXON
Mark Nixon v. Warden Allegheny County Jail
as 19-1298
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK A. NIXON
NIXON v. HARPER
as 2:2018cv01592
Petitioner:
MARK A. NIXON
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARFER and ORLANDO HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NIXON v. HARPER et al
as 2:2016cv01688
Petitioner:
MARK A. NIXON
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER , STEPHEN ZAPPALA, JR. , BRUCE BEEMER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
