Cases 1 - 10 of 29
ADAMS et al v. OLSHAN FROME WOLOSKY LLP
as 2:2023cv22619
Petitioner:
AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC., J. MICHAEL ADAMS, AMY BRADLEY and others
Respondent:
OLSHAN FROME WOLOSKY LLP
Intervenor:
JULIUS D. RUDOLPH, DRIVER OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS I, L.P., IZZY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv18576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
PERSON v. BURLINGTON COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2022cv05284
Plaintiff:
MARK E. PERSON
Defendant:
BURLINGTON COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOLDBERG et al v. BROWN et al
as 2:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
DAVID GOLDBERG and DMG PUBLISHING LLC
Defendant:
MARK E. BROWN, LEAP INDUSTRIES, DEVEION TOUSSANT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BERNIZ v. HOME POINT CAPITAL INC. et al
as 2:2021cv15842
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER BERNIZ
Defendant:
HOME POINT CAPITAL INC., WILLIAM A. NEWMAN, MARK E. ELBAUM and others
KANGAPODA CORPORATION et al v. FACEBOOK, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv09168
Plaintiff:
KANGAPODA CORPORATION and HAROLD P. MINTZ
Defendant:
FACEBOOK, INC. and MARK E. ZUCKERBERG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BLANCO v. RODDY
as 1:2019cv17567
Defendant:
MARK E. RODDY, ESQ.
Plaintiff:
SANTOS BLANCO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DILLON et al v. IRWIN et al
as 3:2019cv08847
Defendant:
JAMES S IRWIN and PRIME SERVICES, LLC
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARY DILLON and MARK E DILLON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MYERS v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.
as 3:2018cv14556
Plaintiff:
MARK E. MYERS
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
BURCH et al v. USA TRUCK, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv09575
Plaintiff:
JACLYN M. BURCH and MARK E. BURCH
Defendant:
USA TRUCK, INC. , FRANK CANAFINO , JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
