Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Patisso v. Epstein, et al.
as 25-3252
Plaintiff:
MATTEO PATISSO, Assignee of the Legal Claims of Liquid Brick, Inc.
Defendant:
MARK EPSTEIN, Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge, GREG HAGEN, CAROL KING and others
Patisso v. Epstein, et al.
as 25-1352
Plaintiff:
MATTEO PATISSO, Assignee of the Legal Claims of Liquid Brick, Inc.
Defendant:
MARK EPSTEIN, Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge, GREG HAGEN, CAROL KING and others
Matteo Patisso v. Mark Epstein et al
as 2:2025cv01666
Plaintiff:
Matteo Patisso
Defendant:
Mark Epstein, Greg Hagen, Carol King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Brett v. Trump et al
as 5:2024cv00281
Defendant:
David Samson, John Morgan, Tom Petty and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Herrera v. Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico et al
as 1:2024cv00548
Defendant:
United States of America, Mark Epstein, MD and Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico
Plaintiff:
Victor Herrera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Herrera v. The Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico et al
as 1:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
Personal Rep. Victor Herrera and Victor Herrera
Defendant:
The Regents of the University of New Mexico, Mark Epstein, Katie Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Champion Exposition Services LLC v. Nexxt Show, LLC
as 1:2010cv12228
Plaintiff:
Champion Exposition Services LLC , WCP Exposition Services Operating Company LLC and WCP Exposition Services Holding Company LLC
Defendant:
Nexxt Show, LLC , Mark Epstein , Matthew Epstein and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
