Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Johnson v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2014cv00184
Petitioner:
Mark Johnson
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, et al
as 4:2013cv00392
Plaintiff:
Mark Johnson and Devon Johnson
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association and The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Wyatt et al v. Dallas County Sheriff's Department Employees et al
as 4:2013cv00177
Plaintiff:
George Wyatt, Jr., Mark Johnson, Dwight C. Jackson and others
Defendant:
Dallas County Sheriff's Department Employees, Dallas City Warrant Office, Parkland Health & Hospital System and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Besherse v. Johnson
as 4:2010cv00652
Plaintiff:
Terry Wayne Besherse
Defendant:
Mark Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boutari et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 5:2009cv00608
Plaintiff:
Lorena G. Boutari, Lorena G. Boutari, James R. Cabaniss and others
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Aurora Loan Services, LLC, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Price v. Johnson
as 4:2009cv01966
Plaintiff:
Casey M Price
Defendant:
Carolyn Marks Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roca et al v. Pugh et al
as 6:2007cv00081
Plaintiff:
Sandra Renee Roca, Sandra Renee Roca, Tonya Burns and others
Defendant:
Larry Pugh, Mark Johnson and City of Jacksonville, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Moses v. Pugh et al
as 6:2007cv00009
Plaintiff:
Mikey Ann Moses
Defendant:
Larry Pugh, Mark Johnson and City of Jacksonville, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
