Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Ederer v. HomeStreet, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02748
Plaintiff:
Marsha Ederer
Defendant:
HomeStreet, Inc., Mark K. Mason, James R. Mitchell, Jr. and others
Buczek v. Keybank, N.A.
as 23-7591
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHANE CHRISTOPHER BUCZEK
Defendant / Appellee:
KEYBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, (Key Bank), CHRISTOPHER M. GORMAN, An Officer of Keybank, N.A. and an Individual, DAVID P. CASE, Esq., Fein, Such & Crane, LLP and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Joseph MorenoIn re: Joseph Moreno
as 22-3563
Petitioner:
In re: JOSEPH MARIO MORENO
Respondent:
MARK K. WILLIAMS
William Morrison, Jr. v. Mark Williams, et al
as 21-4050
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM T. MORRISON, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK K. WILLIAMS, Warden and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Anne Block v. Washington State Bar Associati, et al
as 21-35922
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANNE BLOCK, Esquire, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, LINDA EIDE, individually and in her capacity as an employee of defendant Washington State Bar Association, MARK PLIVILECH, in his individual capacity and in his marital community with wife and/or domestic partner defendant Lin O'Dell and others
William Nietzche, et al v. USDC-ORP
as 21-71267
Not Classified By Court:
In re: WILLIAM X. NIETZCHE, JULIE A. METCALF KINNEY, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, BONY and others
Petitioner:
WILLIAM X. NIETZCHE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, PORTLAND
Macris v. Experian Information Solutions
as 21-2016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark K. Macris
Defendant / Appellee:
Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC.
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Mark K. Wasvary, P.C. v. Facebook, Inc.
as 5:2021cv01518
Plaintiff:
Mark K. Wasvary, P.C.
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
