Cases 1 - 10 of 16
MARTIN v. BRIDGES et al
as 1:2024cv00793
Plaintiff:
MARK L. MARTIN, II
Defendant:
CLARENCE BRIDGES, MICHAEL CECIL, BRENDA FELIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BRIDGES et al
as 1:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
MARK L. MARTIN, II
Defendant:
CHARLES BRIDGES, MICHAEL CECIL, BRENDA FELIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McWilliams v. Warden
as 3:2020cv00596
Petitioner:
Mark L McWilliams and Mark McWilliams
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McWilliams v. Warden
as 3:2020cv00377
Petitioner:
Mark L McWilliams and Mark McWilliams
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FIELDS v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv00550
Plaintiff:
MARK L. FIELDS
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
TROXLER et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv01804
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
NANCY C. TROXLER and MARK L. TROXLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FIELDS v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv02031
Plaintiff:
MARK L. FIELDS
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McWilliams v. Warden
as 3:2018cv00133
Petitioner:
Mark L McWilliams
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Myers v. Tippecanoe County Circuit Court et al
as 4:2016cv00068
Plaintiff:
Jason Tye Myers
Defendant:
Tippecanoe County Circuit Court, Indiana Court of Appeals, James S Kirsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THE GEORGE LEON FAMILY TRUST ET AL. V. EXELIS INC. ET AL.
as 1:2015cv00466
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BALLWEBER, JESSE MALLINGER, THE GEORGE LEON FAMILY TRUST and others
Defendant:
HERMAN E. BULLS, EXELIS, INC., RALPH HAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
