Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-11887
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Calhoun v. Jefferson County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2022cv00571
Plaintiff:
David Calhoun, Jr
Defendant:
Jefferson County Sheriff Department and Mark Pettway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricketts v. Pettway et al
as 2:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Ricketts
Defendant:
Mark Pettway, Washington, Zander Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison v. Pettway et al
as 2:2021cv01580
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Wayne Garrison
Defendant:
Mark Pettway, Advanced Correctional Healthcare Inc and Jefferson County, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benion v. Pettway et al
as 2:2021cv00927
Plaintiff:
Reginald Benion
Defendant:
Mark Pettway, Shela Tyson, Lashanda Scales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Files v. Pettway et al
as 7:2021cv00911
Plaintiff:
De'Raoul Files
Defendant:
Mark Pettway and Jefferson County Sheriff's Department, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Barber v. State of Alabama, et al
as 21-10477
Defendant / Appellee:
HURST TOWING AND RECOVERY INC, BRANDON LEDLOW, JEFFERSON COUNTY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD JOE BARBER
USA, et al v. Erin Ryerson, et al
as 20-14687
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFERSON COUNTY PERSONNEL BOARD, JEFFERSON CTY and MARK PETTWAY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARTIN and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
ERIN C. RYERSON
Pullom v. Jefferson County, Alabama et al
as 2:2020cv01912
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Alabama, Deputy Frederick, Jefferson County Sheriff's Department, Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Pullom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
