Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Jonathan Bryant v. Connections Community Service, et al
as 19-3422
Plaintiff / Appellant: JONATHAN BRYANT
Defendant: DR. MARK RICHARDSON
Defendant / Appellee: CONNECTIONS COMMUNITY SERVICE PROVIDER OF DELAWARE
FERNANDEZ v. BUTLER et al
as 2:2019cv16343
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-20 (Fictitious Names), MARK RICHARDSON BUTLER, ABC CORP 1-20(fictitious) and others
Plaintiff: VANESSA FERNANDEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mark Richardson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probatio, et al
as 19-2288
Defendant / Appellee: PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARK RICHARDSON
RICHARDSON v. ESTOCK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01704
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUPT. LEE ESTOCK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner: MARK RICHARDSON
Defendant: PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carter v. Munoz et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00994
Defendant: Mark Richardson, Paola Munoz and Steven Wesley
Plaintiff: Jermaine Layton Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Department of Corrections We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01035
Plaintiff: Andre R. Thomas
Defendant: Department of Corrections, Dr. Spraga, Dr. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Steele v. Mark Richardson, et al
as 08-2147
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES STEELE
Defendant - Appellee: MARK RICHARDSON, ESQ., TONI MEADOWS and MARK W RICHARDSON PC
STEELE v. RICHARDSON et al
as 2:2007cv03542
Plaintiff: CHARLES STEELE
Defendant: MARK RICHARDSON, TONI MEADOWS and MARK W. RICHARDSON, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?