Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv00324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv00323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Burns et al v. Maxwell et al
as 8:2014cv02793
Plaintiff:
Richard Burns , Borden Deane , Leslie Jacobson and others
Defendant:
Lawrence W. Maxwell, Lawrence T. Maxwell, Century Realty Funds, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Lawrence Belk v. Leon Vickers, et al
as 12-2064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lawrence Belk
Defendant - Appellee:
Leon Vickers, Thomas Baker, Beth Clad and others
Defendant:
Mark Schreiber and Dave Dormire
Thompson v. Dormire et al
as 2:2010cv04031
Plaintiff:
Lamont Thompson
Defendant:
Dave Dormire, Mark Schreiber, David Webster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Belk v. Vickers et al
as 2:2009cv04251
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Belk
Defendant:
Leon Vickers, Thomas Baker, Beth Clad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
