Cases 31 - 40 of 80
Locke v. Missouri Department of Mental Health et al
as 4:2020cv00244
Plaintiff:
Charles Locke
Defendant:
Richard Gowdy, Debra Miles, Missouri Department of Mental Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Douglas v. Eric Schmitt, et al
as 19-3700
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security & Empls of the Social Admin, Janet L. Schanzle, Security Armored Car & It's Insurers, Elaine L. Chao, U. S. Secretary of Transportation & Employees of the Federal Aviation Admin and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Douglas
Dean Davidson v. Mark Stringer, et al
as 19-3670
Defendant / Appellee:
D. Sternberg, Dr., Mark Stringer, MO Department of Mental Health Director, Denise Hacker, COO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dean Bryan Davidson
Garrett v. Minchin et al
as 4:2019cv03224
Defendant:
Rachel Pulley, Emily Kamp, Laura Rosen and others
Plaintiff:
Mason Ibra Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Minchin et al
as 4:2019cv00941
Defendant:
Rachel Pulley, Emily Kamp, Laura Rosen and others
Plaintiff:
Mason Ibra Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Tubbesing et al
as 5:2019cv06151
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant:
Tara Tubbesing, Kelsey Heath, Amanda Markt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Smith v. Tara Tubbesing, et al
as 19-3198
Defendant / Appellee:
Tara Tubbesing, Dr./Chief Operating Officer and Mark Stringer, MO Dept. of Mental Health Dr.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larry Lee Smith
Dean Davidson v. Mark Stringer
as 19-2984
Respondent / Appellee:
Mark Stringer
Petitioner / Appellant:
Dean Bryan Davidson
Smith v. Tubbesing et al
as 5:2019cv06122
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant:
Tara Tubbesing and Mark Stringer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGee v. Schmitt
as 4:2019cv02477
Plaintiff:
Kevin Douglas McGee
Defendant:
Daivd Schmitt, Denise Hacker, Richard Gowdy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
