Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jeremy Kerr v. Robert Pollex, et al
as 22-3993
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY LYNN KERR
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT POLLEX, ALAN R. MAYBERRY, MATTHEW REGER and others
Kerr v. Pollex et al
as 3:2021cv01750
Plaintiff:
Jeremy L. Kerr
Defendant:
Robert Pollex, Alan Mayberry, Matthew Reger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Socha, et al v. Wasylyshyn et al
as 3:2018cv02220
Defendant:
Deputy Ricardo Cardenas, Deputy T Lachey, Sheriff Mark Wasylyshyn and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Socha and Katherine Socha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Wood County, Ohio/Wood County Board of Commissioners et al
as 3:2017cv00459
Plaintiff:
Amanda Martin
Defendant:
Wood County, Ohio/Wood County Board of Commissioners, Mark Wasylyshyn, Lois Devore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beverly Getz v. J. Swoap, et al
as 15-3514
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BEVERLY J. GETZ, Executrix for the Estate of Robert T. Getz
Defendant - Appellee:
J. SWOAP, Wood County Sheriff's Office, MARK WASYLYSHYN, Wood County Sheriff and WOOD COUNTY
Kolacki v. Wood County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2015cv00683
Plaintiff:
Nicole Kolacki
Defendant:
Wood County Sheriff's Office and Mark Wasylyshyn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Getz v. Swoap et al
as 3:2013cv01492
Plaintiff:
Robert T. Getz
Defendant:
J. Swoap , Mark Wasylyshyn and Wood County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diver v. Dobson et al
as 3:2012cv00957
Plaintiff:
Theodore J. Diver
Defendant:
Paul A. Dobson , Mark Wasylyshyn , Wood County, Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-3110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kerr v. Mayberry et al
as 3:2009cv02901
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Kerr
Defendant:
Alan Mayberry, Ray Fischer, Aram Ohanian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
