Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,093
Mark Gooding v. Parole Board, et al
as 24-1438
Petitioner: MARK ANTHONY GOODING
Respondent: PAROLE BOARD and MICHELLE FLOYD, Warden
White v. Sturm et al
as 2:2024cv11274
Plaintiff: Mark White
Defendant: Sturm, Carter, Richardson and others
Larry Johnson, Sr. v. Lee Coffee, et al
as 24-5468
Plaintiff: LARRY D. JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant: LEE V. COFFEE, Assistant District Attorney (former). In individual and official capacity., ARTHUR THOMAS BENNETT, Judge Criminal Court. In individual and official capacity., GWENDOLYN ROOKS, General Sessions Court Judge. Individual capacity and others
Dawson v. Sargus et al
as 2:2024cv02175
Plaintiff: William T. Dawson, Jr.
Defendant: Judge Edmund A Sargus, Jr, Christin Werner, Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Deas v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County et al
as 5:2024cv00123
Plaintiff: Deandrae Deas
Defendant: Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kenneth Atkerson, Jeramie Waak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Annabel, II v. Sherman Campbell, et al
as 24-1322
Plaintiff: ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant: SHERMAN CAMPBELL, Warden, DAVID MESSER, CHRISTINA BATES and others
Bredow v. Le et al
as 4:2024cv10979
Plaintiff: Mark Wade Bredow
Defendant: Le, Lindell, Shawn and others
Mark Hill v. Jennifer Pell, et al
as 24-3268
Plaintiff: MARK ANTHONY HILL
Defendant: JENNIFER PELL, SCOTT CRAWFORD, BRITTANY N. HAMM and others
Frederick Stampone v. Michigan Supreme Court, et al
as 24-1252
Plaintiff: FREDERICK STAMPONE
Defendant: MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT, Official and or personal capacity, JULIE CLEMENT, Clerk, official and or personal capacity, MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS, Official and personal capacity and others
Marks v. Douglas
as 2:2024cv10736
Petitioner: Lavelle Eugene Marks
Respondent: Adam Douglas

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?