Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Coleman v. Bunch et al
as 1:2017cv00186
Plaintiff:
Edwin Tyrone Coleman
Defendant:
Wesley Bunch, Justin Clifton, Dean Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burrage v. Ross et al
as 1:2015cv00244
Plaintiff:
Marlin Burrage
Defendant:
Joy Ross and Timothy Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Marlin v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00152
Plaintiff:
James Marlin
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
1st Source Bank v. Torgusen
as 1:2010cv00540
Plaintiff:
1st Source Bank
Defendant:
Marlin F. Torgusen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. One (1) Sears Roebuck & Co, Model 300, 20 Gauge Shotgun, SN Q67225 et al
as 2:2010cv00186
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One (1) Sears Roebuck & Co, Model 300, 20 Gauge Shotgun, SN Q67225, One (1) Sears Roebuck & Co, Model 25, .22 Caliber Rifle, SN 5832501 and One (1) Marlin, Model 60, .22 Caliber Rifle, SN 073388991, with Scope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
Davis v. Pearson
as 5:2010cv00018
Plaintiff:
Marlin Davis
Defendant:
Bruce Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pounders & Associates XIX, LLC v. Harris et al
as 1:2009cv00212
Plaintiff:
Pounders & Associates XIX, LLC
Defendant:
Marlin Harris, Lenny's Franchisor, LLC, Lenny's Franchisor, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Perkins v. Miller et al
as 3:2009cv00169
Plaintiff:
Marvin Perkins
Defendant:
Marlin A. Miller, Jr. and Ronnie Pennington
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reddoch v. The Marlin Firearms Company
as 4:2008cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jerry Donald Reddoch
Defendant:
The Marlin Firearms Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
