Cases 1 - 10 of 127
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01749
Petitioner:
Marquis Valantee Tate
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00902
Petitioner:
Marquis Valantee' Tate
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shepherd v. TDCJ et al
as 1:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Kernelius Marquis Shepherd, Sr.
Defendant:
TDCJ, FNU Chevalier, Jailyn LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00437
Petitioner:
Marquis Valantee Tate
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shepherd v. Saunders et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Kernelius Marquis Shepherd, Sr.
Defendant:
M.D. Frank Saunders, Michael White, Angela N Chevalier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Taylor et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Jamal Marquis Franklin
Defendant:
Naidja Taylor and State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04795
Petitioner:
Marquis Valantee Tate
Respondent:
TDCJ, Director Bobby Lumpkin and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04480
Petitioner:
Marquis Valantee Tate
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ware v. Bishop et al
as 1:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Marquis Deyshaun Ware
Defendant:
Ricky Bishop, Tim Trawick and T. Polluck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shepherd v. TDCJ et al
as 1:2023cv00397
Plaintiff:
Kernelius Marquis Shepherd, Sr.
Defendant:
TDCJ and UTMB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
