Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Turner v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv01827
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Turner
Defendant:
Phillip Smith, Unknown Goduto, Joseph Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vistancia Development LLC v. Preston et al
as 2:2021cv01707
Plaintiff:
Vistancia Development LLC
Defendant:
Marsha Preston and DBD LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gainey et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv01907
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Keith N Gainey and Marsha Gainey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elwell v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00893
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Marsha Elwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Drapp v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv02933
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Marsha Drapp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv00994
Plaintiff:
Charles Jones and Marsha Jones
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gamble v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv00368
Plaintiff:
Marsha Gamble
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neda v. Maricopa County Correctional Health Services et al
as 2:2017cv02221
Plaintiff:
Augustine Neda
Defendant:
Maricopa County Correctional Health Services, Unknown Gann, Jeff Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
