Cases 21 - 30 of 3,193
Jerry Alexander et al v. Dean Meiling et al
as 8:2024mc00008
Plaintiff:
Jerry Alexander, Marty Cohen, Charles Delle Donne and others
Defendant:
Dean Meiling, Madylon Meiling, Chemeon Surface Technology LLC and others
Jeannite v. Flaherty et al
as 1:2024cv10364
Plaintiff:
Joel Jeannite
Defendant:
Maureen Flaherty, Charles Marshall, Judge Maura and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Richmond v. Reese, et al.
as 24-1811
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL CHARLES RICHMOND
Defendant:
MICHAEL REESE, Multnomah County Sheriff, STEVEN ALEXANDER and KURTISS MORRISON
Smith v. Connolly et al
as 1:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
James Richard Smith, III
Defendant:
Colm F. Connolly, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
WP COMPANY LLC v. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY et al
as 1:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
WP COMPANY LLC doing business as WASHINGTON POST
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Marshall v. Kovo HealthTech Corporation
as 1:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Marshall and Jonathan Marshall
Defendant:
Kovo HealthTech Corporation
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration
Marshall v. State of California et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Gus Who Marshall
Defendant:
State of California, U.S. Government, Valley Water and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
RADI v. MARSHALL
as 1:2024cv00609
Plaintiff:
AMANDA ALICE RADI
Defendant:
DENISE MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States v. Anthony Marshall
as 24-1518
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthony Byron Marshall
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
