Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Strong v. Shelter Plus Care et al
as 3:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Zachary Strong
Defendant:
Shelter Plus Care, Mecklenburg County, Kenya Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BEY v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
ABJUL BEY and JAGUAR SUN OF BA-PAKAL LUMA NATION
Defendant:
JUDGE BRADLEY R. ALLEN, SR., GRAHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT, HAW RIVER POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Etienne v. Sanders et al
as 5:2023cv00214
Respondent:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Petitioner:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
Reserve at Carrington Place
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Tolbert v. King et al
as 3:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Shantal Tolbert
Defendant:
Willye Mai King, Richelieu Dennis, Yende Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Clervrain v. Marshall
as 3:2021cv00316
Defendant:
Elaine F. Marshall
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. City of Concord et al
as 5:2021cv00201
Defendant:
Estate of Marshall James Lee, Estate of George Monroe Vogler Jr., Guy Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Wallace Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. City of Concord et al
as 4:2021cv00063
Defendant:
Estate of Marshall James Lee, Estate of George Monroe Vogler Jr., Guy Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Wallace Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOPKINS v. EADS et al
as 1:2021cv00078
Defendant:
J D EADS, MONTY G WOLFE, TERRY DALTON and others
Plaintiff:
TOMMY HOPKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
