Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gaiter v. Marshall et al
as 3:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Felix Xavier Rasul Gaiter
Defendant:
Hayden Marshall and Adam Neely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marshall v. Silas et al
as 2:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Jessica N Marshall
Defendant:
Silas, Pelekakis and Sullivan Co Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Patrick v. Childress et al
as 2:2022cv02659
Plaintiff:
Marshall Patrick
Defendant:
Rena Mae Childress, West Patrick, Jr., Fannie Sue Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hale v. Johnson
as 1:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lewis Hale, Jr.
Defendant:
Roger Chadswick Johnson, Charlie Riffenberry, Sherry Sheldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Golden et al
as 3:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Ashly Carmelle Dorsainville, Fridelyne Maisoneuve and others
Defendant:
Scott Golden, Jennifer Little, Pat Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Glatz v. Newcomb et al
as 3:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Glenn Fred Glatz
Defendant:
Ronald Crockett Newcomb, James Bruce Dunn, Tony Lynn Tarwater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Accord v. Anderson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2021cv00077
Defendant:
Henderson County, Tennessee, Polk County, Tennessee, Hamilton County, Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Accord
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glatz v. Newcomb
as 3:2021cv00026
Defendant:
Ronald C Newcomb, G.W. McCoig, FBI and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Fred Glatz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
