Cases 1 - 10 of 609
Ketzbeau v. Ivy et al
as 4:2024cv11006
Plaintiff:
Jesse I Ketzbeau
Defendant:
Curtis Ivy, Jr., Frances K. Behm, Nancy Abraham and others
Marshall #732012 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Calvin Eunice Marshall #732012
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts, Unknown Party #1, Unknown Party #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Rewerts et al
as 2:2024cv10872
Plaintiff:
Calvin Eunice Marshall
Defendant:
Rewerts, John Doe, West and others
Siraj Ibrihim v. Dewun Settle, et al
as 24-5302
Plaintiff:
SIRAJ IBRIHIM, aka Robert J. Crain
Defendant:
DEWUN R. SETTLE, WARDEN SHELBY COUNTY CORRECTIONS, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Siraj Ibrihim v. Dewun Settle, et al
as 24-5258
Plaintiff:
SIRAJ IBRIHIM, aka Robert J. Crain
Defendant:
DEWUN R. SETTLE, WARDEN SHELBY COUNTY CORRECTIONS, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Cain v. Marshall et al
as 5:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Captin Thomas Marshall, Jailer Ken Claud, Comprehensive Correctional Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cain v. Comprehensive Correctional Care et al
as 5:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Comprehensive Correctional Care, Nurse Provider Leesia Smith, Ken Claud and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kuhl v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Samuel Alexander Kuhl
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, United States Marshal Service, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Aaron Clark, IV v. C. Wilson, et al
as 24-1128
Plaintiff:
AARON CLARK, IV
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PERTTU, Resident Unit Manager, in personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SKYTTA, in personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MICHAELSON, in personal capacity and others
David Lettieri v. Federal Marshals
as 24-3094
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant:
FEDERAL MARSHALS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
