Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 1 - 10 of 988
Robinson v. Terry et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00358
Plaintiff: James Robinson
Defendant: Alcornelia Terry, John Q. Hamm and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Russaw v. United States Marshal Service et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00352
Plaintiff: Alexander Russaw
Defendant: United States Marshal Service, Anthony T. Bergamine, Denzel Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00355
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cleckler v. McClain et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00334
Plaintiff: Joshua Matthew Cleckler
Defendant: Antonio McClain and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Askew v. Warden Mckee, III et al
as 2:2024cv00692
Petitioner: Brian Denare Askew
Defendant: Warden Mckee, III and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dillard v. Marshall
as 3:2024cv00685
Petitioner: Edward Ray Dillard
Defendant: Steven Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ridgeway v. Casey
as 2:2024cv00619
Plaintiff: Clifton Marshall Ridgeway
Defendant: Pamela Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
South v. Pilkington et al
as 4:2024cv00606
Plaintiff: Kayla South
Defendant: Cheri Pilkington, Christy Edwards, Steve Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Pilkington et al
as 4:2024cv00607
Plaintiff: John Bradley White
Defendant: Cheri Pilkington, Christie Edwards, Steve Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00575
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?