Cases 41 - 50 of 139
BANKS v. MUELLAR et al
as 2:2019cv00541
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER, HON. VANOSKIE, ROBERT MUELLAR and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MICHAELS v. MADDEN et al
as 2:2019cv00207
Defendant:
WESTMORELAND COUNTY JAIL, US MARSHALL PENNSYLVANIA, WESTMORELAND COUNTY COURTHOUSE and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES THOMAS MICHAELS and JAMES THOMAS MICHAELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOBLE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv00031
Plaintiff:
ROBERT EARL NOBLE
Defendant:
CONNIE DUGAN, STEVE DELUCA, SCOTT W. BRADY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TALLEY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2018cv01687
Defendant:
LT. COLLINS, JARED ANKROM, LISA DUNCAN and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BANKS v. WALKER et al
as 2:2018cv01565
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TALLEY et al v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv01339
Defendant:
LT. COLLINS, OFFICE OF POPULATION MANAGEMENT, SCOTT A KNICKELSON and others
Plaintiff:
MARCUS WALKER, QUINTEZ TALLEY, GARLAND BAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MARSHALL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2018cv01333
Defendant:
MONONGAHELA VALLEY HOSPITAL, GIRISH RIBADIUA, M.D., UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00894
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SANCHEZ v. LYNCH et al
as 3:2017cv00215
Petitioner:
FERNANDO SANCHEZ
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH and UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BIEDERMAN v. CALGON CARBON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv01459
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL BIEDERMAN
Defendant:
CALGON CARBON CORPORATION, RANDALL S. DEARTH, J. RICH ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
