Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Kenneth Brewer v. Marshall Pike
as 23-7182
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH BREWER
Defendant / Appellee:
MARSHALL PIKE, JULIETA PLANLO and NANCY ERIN
Haze v. Medical Provider et al
as 5:2023ct03300
Plaintiff:
Grant Ruffin Haze, III
Defendant:
Medical Provider, Nurse Jane Doe 1, Nurse Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Pike et al
as 5:2023ct03052
Plaintiff:
Clarence E. Edwards
Defendant:
Marshall Pike, Cathy Judge, James D. Giggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ammons v. Ishee et al
as 5:2022ct03307
Plaintiff:
Caleb Ammons
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee, Terri Katlett, David Snell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Land v. N.C. DPS Health Providers et al
as 5:2022ct03156
Plaintiff:
Jarry Allen Land
Defendant:
N.C. DPS Health Providers, Marshall Pike and N.C. DPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teague v. Pike et al
as 5:2021ct03355
Plaintiff:
Charles O'Briien Teague and Charles O'Brien Teague
Defendant:
Marshall Pike, Jimmy Dorman and Scott Velasco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathaniel Webb v. John Godfrey
as 21-7184
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL R. WEBB
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JOHN GODFREY, MARSHALL PIKE, JANICE GRIMES and others
Tony Harris v. Roy Cooper
as 21-7102
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONY A. HARRIS
Plaintiff:
GRANT RUFFIN HAZE, III, LINWOOD EARL DUFFIE, KEVIN MCQUEEN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR ROY COOPER, JOHN GODFREY and MARSHALL PIKE
Harris v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2021ct03185
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Roy Cooper, John Godfrey and others
Plaintiff:
Tony A. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Godfrey et al
as 5:2021ct03068
Plaintiff:
Curtis Cardwell, Jason D. Smith and Jimmy Locklear
Defendant:
Every Shift Captain, Marshall Pike, John Godfrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
