Cases 1 - 10 of 29
YUEN et al v. IDEXX LABORATORIES INC et al
as 2:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
CAM YUEN, ARRIANNA GARCIA, KATHRYN HEBERLING and others
Defendant:
IDEXX LABORATORIES INC and IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
ABADI v. WALMART INC et al
as 1:2022cv00228
Plaintiff:
AARON ABADI
Defendant:
WALMART INC, WAL-MART STORES EAST LP, JANET T MILLS and others
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROBERTS v. OFFICE OF THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL et al
as 1:2021cv00297
Plaintiff:
MARK J ROBERTS
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE STATE FIRE MARSHAL and JOSEPH E THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PENA v. MARSHALL COMMUNICATIONS INC
as 1:2019cv00380
Defendant:
MARSHALL COMMUNICATIONS INC
Plaintiff:
ALBERT PENA
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
LIETZKE v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2017cv00329
Plaintiff:
BILL LIETZKE
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, REESE MCKINNEY and DT MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. SONG et al
as 2:2017cv00277
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
SOO SONG, ROBERT CESSAR, MARK R HORNAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEOPLES UNITED BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. CHAPMAN et al
as 2:2017cv00228
Defendant:
KEEPERS HOUSE INN LLC and W MARSHALL CHAPMAN, JR
Plaintiff:
PEOPLES UNITED BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00190
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
MARSHALL v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2016cv00518
Plaintiff:
CAROL LYNN MARSHALL
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
