Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Schweitzer v. U S Marshal Service et al
as 1:2023cv01381
Plaintiff:
Erin D Schweitzer
Defendant:
U S Marshal Service, Brown County Jail, Medical Staff at Brown County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leon, Jose v. The United States et al
as 3:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jose Israel Leon
Defendant:
The United States, Department of Defense - U.S., Department of Justice - C.I.A. Headquarters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goodvine v. Severson et al
as 2:2021cv00045
Defendant:
Jim Matthews, Waukesha County Jail, Michael Giese and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Goodvine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hillsberg v. US Marshals Service
as 2:2020cv01848
Petitioner:
Earl James Hillsberg
Respondent:
US Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Faulkner v. United States Marshals Service
as 1:2020cv00026
Petitioner:
Alvin Faulkner
Respondent:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01440
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall, Charles v. Spears et al
as 3:2017cv00749
Plaintiff:
Charles Deshawn Hall
Defendant:
Spears, McCarragher, Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Robert et al
as 2:2016cv00720
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Richard W Robert, Henry H Kennedy, Rosemary M Collyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Neill v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2016cv00425
Plaintiff:
Kevin P O'Neill
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Khan v. United States of America et al
as 2:2014cv00285
Plaintiff:
Dianne Khan
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Marshals Service, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
