Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Martin Akerman v. MSPB, et al
as 26-5131
Plaintiff:
Martin Akerman
Defendant:
Merit Systems Protection Board, Office of Special Counsel, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and others
Newsom, et al. v. Trump, et al.
as 25-5553
Plaintiff:
GAVIN NEWSOM, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, PETER HEGSETH, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Defense and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Amicus Curiae:
MARTIN AKERMAN, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CITY OF ALAMEDA and others
Akerman v. United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Las Vegas
as 25-5501
Petitioner:
MARTIN AKERMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS
Real Party In Interest:
HENRY J. KERNER, CAESAR GARDUNO, BRETT BASLER and others
Martin Akerman, v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company
as 25-2345
Plaintiff:
MARTIN AKERMAN, I
Defendant:
NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Akerman v. United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Las Vegas
as 25-4331
Petitioner:
MARTIN AKERMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS
Real Party In Interest:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA and NEVADA NATIONAL GUARD
Vasquez Perdomo, et al. v. Noem, et al.
as 25-4312
Plaintiff:
PEDRO VASQUEZ PERDOMO, JORGE HERNANDEZ VIRAMONTES, UNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA and others
Defendant:
KRISTI NOEM, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, TODD M. LYONS, Acting Los Angeles Field Office Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Amicus Curiae:
MARTIN AKERMAN, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES and others
Newsom, et al. v. Trump, et al.
as 25-3727
Plaintiff:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA and GAVIN NEWSOM, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA, In his official capacity as Governor of the State of California
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, PETER HEGSETH, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Defense and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Amicus Curiae:
CALIFORNIA STATE LEGISLATURE, BIPARTISAN FORMER GOVERNORS, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and others
Newsom et al v. Trump et al
as 3:2025cv04870
Plaintiff:
Governor Gavin Newsom and State of California
Defendant:
President Donald J. Trump, Pete Hegseth and U.S. Department of Defense
Amicus Curiae:
Blue Eagle Coalition, State of Iowa, State of Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Injunction
Cathy Harris v. Scott Bessent, et al
as 25-5055
Plaintiff:
Cathy A. Harris, in her personal capacity and in her official capacity as Member of the Merit Systems Protection Board
Defendant:
Scott Bessent, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury, Trent Morse, in his official capacity as Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy Director of the White House Presidential Personnel Office, Sergio Gor, in his official capacity as Director of the White House Presidential Personnel Office and others
Amicus Curiae:
John C. Coates, IV, Martin Akerman, Constitutional Accountability Center and others
Hampton Dellinger v. Scott Bessent, et al
as 25-5052
Plaintiff:
Hampton Dellinger, in his personal capacity and in his official capacity as Special Counsel of the Office of Special Counsel
Defendant:
Scott Bessent, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury, Sergio Gor, in his official capacity as Director of the White House Presidential Personnel Office, Karen Gorman, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Special Counsel, upon the purported removal of the Special Counsel, the Acting Special Counsel of the Office of Special Counsel and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Florida, Cathy A. Harris, State of Alabama and others
Intervenor:
Damian R. Nastri
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
