Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Gonzales v. S. Allen Enterprises, Corp. et al
as 1:2012cv00073
Plaintiff:
Martin Gonzales
Defendant:
S. Allen Enterprises, Corp., Jennifer Allen and Scott Allen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01654
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mendoza et al v. O-I-SHI-I Sushi Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv06855
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Mendoza and Martin Gonzales
Defendant:
O-I-SHI-I Sushi Corp and Man Wah Lin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
USA v. Jose Gonzalez-Pulido
as 11-10065
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE MARTIN GONZALEZ-PULIDO, AKA Martin Gonzales-Pulido, AKA Martin Gonzalez-Pulido
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02000
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jiron v. Kuenhold et al
as 1:2010cv00712
Plaintiff:
Lawrence M. Jiron
Defendant:
O. John Kuenhold, Robert W. Ogburn, Peter L. Comar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Tapia, et al
as 09-2252
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARTIN GONZALES
Respondent - Appellee:
GEORGE TAPIA, Warden and GARY K. KING, Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Archuleta et al v. Chavez et al
as 1:2009cv00606
Plaintiff:
Joseph Archuleta, Christopher Asjes, Eddie Chavez and others
Defendant:
Joe R Williams, George Tapia and Lawrence Jaramillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Tapia et al
as 1:2009cv00590
Plaintiff:
Martin Gonzales
Defendant:
George Tapia and The Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huffman et al v. Crane Plumbing, LLC
as 6:2007cv00197
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Huffman, Jerry Blagg, David Antis and others
Defendant:
Crane Plumbing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
