Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Mack v. USA
as 23-60558
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joy Mack, Others so Affected
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, and U.S. Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, HHS Office for Human Research Protections, and OHRP Director Dr. Jerry A. Menikoff and others
Amalgamated Transit Union International, et al v. USDOL, et al
as 23-15503
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION INTERNATIONAL, AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION LOCAL 192, AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, LOCAL 256 and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, MARTIN J. WALSH, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the United States Department of Labor and JULIE A. SU, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary of the United States Department of Labor
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
State of Nebraska, et al v. Martin Walsh, et al
as 23-15179
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF INDIANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ARIZONA and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Arizona
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN J. WALSH, in his official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Labor, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Wage & Hour Division, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States and others
Texas Medical Association et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, LLC, Dr. Adam Corley and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Personnel Management, Department of Labor and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Society of Anesthesiologists, American College of Radiology, American College of Emergency Physicians and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Utah et al v. Walsh et al
as 2:2023cv00016
Not Classified By Court:
State of Iowa
Plaintiff:
State of Utah, State of Texas, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant:
Martin Walsh, Secretary of Labor, U. S. Department of Labor and Martin J Walsh
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Lifenet, Inc. et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2022cv00453
Plaintiff:
Lifenet, Inc., AIR METHODS CORPORATION, Rocky Mountain Holdings, LLC and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Department of the Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Texas Medical Association et al. v. US Department of Health and Human Services et al.
as 6:2022cv00450
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, LLC and Dr. Adam Corley
Defendant:
US Department of Health and Human Services,, Department of Labor, Department of the Treasury and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Office of Personnel Management, Kiran Ahuja, Janet Yellen and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Lifenet, Inc., Air Methods Corporation, Rocky Mountain Holdings, LLC and others
Amicus Curiae:
Emergency Department Practice Management Association
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Ramon Torres Hernandez, et al v. Martin Walsh, et al
as 22-35913
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAMON TORRES HERNANDEZ and FAMILIAS UNIDAS POR LA JUSTICIA, AFL-CIO, a labor organization
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN J. WALSH, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of Labor, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, WASHINGTON STATE EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPARTMENT and others
Broadgate, Inc v. Martin Walsh
as 22-1944
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BROADGATE, INC
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN J. WALSH, Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor
Lifenet, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2022cv00373
Plaintiff:
Lifenet, Inc.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, U.S. Department of the Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
