Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Compucom Systems Inc v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv06241
Defendant:
NEC Display Solutions of America Inc, NEC Corporation of America, Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd and others
Special Master:
Martin Quinn
Plaintiff:
Compucom Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
The AASI Creditor Liquidating Trust v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv05781
Special Master:
Martin Quinn
Defendant:
CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
The AASI Creditor Liquidating Trust
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Tech Data Corporation et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv05765
Special Master:
Martin Quinn
Defendant:
CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Tech Data Product Management, Inc. and Tech Data Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv04119
Plaintiff:
ABC Appliance, Inc., P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation and Marta Cooperative of America, Inc.
Special Master:
Martin Quinn
Defendant:
NEC Corporation of America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, CMO Japan CO., LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Schultze Agency Services, LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv03856
Special Master:
Martin Quinn
Defendant:
NEC Corporation of America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, CMO Japan CO., LTD and others
Plaintiff:
Schultze Agency Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Interbond Corporation of America v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv03763
Special Master:
Martin Quinn
Defendant:
CMO Japan Co., Ltd., NEC Corporation of America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Interbond Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Office Depot, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv02225
Special Master:
Martin Quinn
Plaintiff:
Office Depot, Inc.
Defendant:
CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Mitsui & Co. (Usa) Inc., and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
MetroPCS Wireless Inc v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv00829
Special Master:
Martin Quinn
Defendant:
Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Toshiba America Electronic Components Inc and others
Plaintiff:
MetroPCS Wireless Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Electrograph Systems, Inc. et al v. Epson Imaging Devices Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00117
Not Classified By Court:
Viewsonic Corporation and Nassau Suffolk Lumber & Supply
Special Master:
Martin Quinn
Defendant:
Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, CMO Japan CO., LTD, Toshiba Matsushita Display Technology, LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas C. Giordan, Electrograph Technologies, Corp. and Electrograph Systems, Inc.
Claimant:
State Board of Equalization of the State of California
Intervenor:
NEC LCD Technologies, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2007md01827
Defendant:
Toshiba Mobile Display Company, Ltd., Sony Corporation, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tammy Long, Judd Eliasoph, Robert Harmon and others
Intervenor:
Leah Nylen, Chris Donnelly, State of Mississippi and others
Special Master:
Martin Quinn, Mr. Daniel Weinstein and Fern M Smith
Not Classified By Court:
Julius N. Dunmore, Jr., Stefan Rest, Dale Keena and others
Counter Defendant:
Rockwell Automation Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America, LLC, Acer America Corporation and others
Interested Party:
Douglas C. Giordan, Joseph M. Alioto, Alexandra Brudy and others
Counter Claimant:
LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
State of South Carolina and State of California
Claimant:
Tiffany and Company, CA Technologies, Inc., American University and others
Trustee:
Charles W Daff
Petitioner:
Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ricoh Electronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
