Cases 1 - 10 of 1,261
Campbell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Karen S. Campbell
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Sheetz v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Ronnie R Sheetz
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SCHWARTZ v. HOCKEY et al
as 1:2024cv00965
Plaintiff:
JASON SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
HOCKEY, MARTIN, A. TERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARGITT v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00975
Plaintiff:
DEBORA HARGITT
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
MARTIN v. WABASH VAL, COR, FAC MEDICAL STAFF et al
as 2:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
KAMERON W. MARTIN
Defendant:
WABASH VAL, COR, FAC MEDICAL STAFF, SAMUEL J. BYRD, KAYCEE BURRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDOWELL v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00950
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER R. MCDOWELL
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
BURNETTE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00957
Plaintiff:
ANGELA D. BURNETTE
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Shepardson v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Deborah A Shepardson
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CLEMONS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
ASHLEIGH JO CLEMONS
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
STILES v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY K STILES
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
