Cases 21 - 30 of 59
In re: Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014md02542
Plaintiff:
Yelda Mesbah Bartlett, Bay Valley Foods, LLC, Lavinia Simona Biasell and others
Defendant:
Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc., Keurig Green Mountain, Inc., Keurig Green Mountain, Inc., f/k/a Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc., and as successor to Keurig, and others
Interested Party:
JBR, Inc. (d/b/a Rogers Family Company)
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
All Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs
Petitioner:
Sagentia, Inc. and Sagentia, Ltd.
Special Master:
Hon. Barbara S. Jones
Not Classified By Court:
Amazon.Com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Hudson et al v. Vitol, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv03217
Defendant:
SK Energy Americas, Inc., SK Trading International Co. Ltd. and Vitol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary Hudson and Elizabeth Gendron
Interested Party:
Pacific Wine Distributors, Inc., Vincent Cendejas, Justin Lardinois and others
Not Classified By Court:
The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
HUDSON v BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC et al
as 3:2019cv03586
Defendant:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC and BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY
Plaintiff:
REGINA MARIE HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hudson v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04758
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Regina Marie Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Hudson et al v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00924
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Getinge AB
Plaintiff:
Mary Hudson and Lawrence Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America Upon the Relation and For the Use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-of-Way over 0.24 Acre of Land, more or less, in Tallahatchie County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2018cv00169
Defendant:
Unknown Heirs of Clyde Lee Moore, Lashawn Towns, Unknown Heirs of Candis M. Patton and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America Upon the Relation and For the Use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Respondent:
Ora Johnson, Jerlean Hawkins and Beulah Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
American Wild Horse Campaign, et al v. Sally Jewell, et al
as 17-35963
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AMERICAN WILD HORSE PRESERVATION CAMPAIGN, THE CLOUD FOUNDATION, RETURN TO FREEDOM and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SALLY JEWELL, Secretary, Department of the Interior, NEIL KORNZE, Director, Bureau of Land Management, ELLIOT TRAHER, Field Manager, Jarbridge Field Office, Bureau of Land Management and others
HUDSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv10379
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Plaintiff:
DONNA MARIE HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hudson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2017cv02072
Plaintiff:
Mary Hudson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hudson v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv04929
Plaintiff:
Mary Hudson
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
