Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Smith v. Bolinger et al.
as 5:2024cv00787
Plaintiff:
DeAerre Smith
Defendant:
Joshua Bolinger, Deputy McCutcheon, Becky McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Bolinger et al.
as 5:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
DeAerre Smith and Smurk
Defendant:
Joshua Bolinger, Deputy McCutcheon, Becky McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00903
Plaintiff:
Mary Margaret Andrews
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Skibski v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv01554
Plaintiff:
Mary Margaret Skibski
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Hall v. G.M.S. Management Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01564
Plaintiff:
James William Hall
Defendant:
G.M.S. Management Co., Inc., James R. Ogden, Barberton Municipal Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aldis et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05318
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
BARRY C. WOODS and MARY MARGARET KATHLEEN KATIE ALDIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Darby v. Kagler, et al
as 5:2016cv02426
Plaintiff:
Mary Louise Darby
Defendant:
Robert Kagler, Alfred Schrader, Thomas O. Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01985
Plaintiff:
Mary Margaret Smith
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hall, et al v Callahan, et al
as 5:2011cv01740
Plaintiff:
Sharon Hall and James Cody
Defendant:
Lynne S. Callahan , Paul J. Gallagher , Judy Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Lavelle v. Lavelle
as 1:2011cv00600
Plaintiff:
Lauren F. Lavelle
Defendant:
Mary Margaret Lavelle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
