Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Squires v. Wareham et al
as 5:2023ct03202
Plaintiff:
Illya Devon Squires
Defendant:
Matthew T. Wareham, Mary S. Whitford, Robert McAfee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CORSO v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2018cv00669
Defendant:
OFFICER WALL, OFFICER TORENCE, SGT. CAMERON E. GADDY and others
Plaintiff:
LELAND CORSO
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431
Burcham v. McCrory et al
as 5:2013ct03254
Plaintiff:
Richard Stephen Burcham
Defendant:
Pat McCrory, Robert C. Lewis, Mary S. Pollard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffith v. Keller et al
as 5:2011ct03165
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Griffith
Defendant:
Alvin Keller, Renoice Stancil, NCPLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Smith et al
as 5:2010ct03196
Plaintiff:
Percy Allen Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Lewis O. Smith, Alvin W. Keller, Jr., Robert C. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Eagles et al
as 5:2010ct03163
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Reid, Jr.
Defendant:
Catherine C. Eagles, R. Stuart Albright, Lindsey R. Davis, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry v. Perdue et al
as 5:2010ct03154
Plaintiff:
Roger Carl Berry
Defendant:
Beverly Eaves Perdue, Alvin W. Keller, Mary S. Pollard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellison v. Elledge et al
as 3:2010cv00157
Plaintiff:
Zonta Tavaras Ellison
Defendant:
Mary S. Elledge, Daniel E. Bailey, Jr., Rodney D. Monroe and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
BARFIELD v. SCOTLAND CARDIOLOGY, PA
as 1:2008cv00396
Plaintiff:
MARY S. BARFIELD
Defendant:
SCOTLAND CARDIOLOGY, PA, MATTHEW BLOCK and DESIREE BLOCK
Cause Of Action: Diversity
KALLAM et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv00474
Plaintiff:
HYLTON BOONE KALLAM and MARY S. KALLAM
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC., BORGWARNER MORSE TEC INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
