Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Harper et al v. Massey Coal Services, Inc.
as 2:2010cv00894
Plaintiff:
Robert Harper, Jr. , Michael Brandon James , Ted Morriston and others
Defendant:
Massey Coal Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Allied Security, Inc. v. Massey Energy Company, et al.
as 2:2008cv01170
Plaintiff:
Allied Security, Inc.
Defendant:
Massey Energy Company, Massey Energy Company, Massey Coal Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ALLIED SECURITY, INC. v. MASSEY ENERGY COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv00337
Plaintiff:
ALLIED SECURITY, INC.
Defendant:
MASSEY ENERGY COMPANY, MASSEY COAL SERVICES, INC., PERFORMANCE COAL COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Massey Energy Company, et al.
as 2:2007cv00299
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America, United States of America and others
Defendant:
Massey Energy Company, A.T. Massey Coal Company, Massey Coal Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Fitzgibbon v. Massey Coal Services, Inc., et al
as 2:2007cv00197
Plaintiff:
Daniel F. Fitzgibbon, Jr., Daniel F. Fitzgibbon, Jr., Daniel F. Fitzgibbon, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Massey Coal Services, Inc., Massey Coal Services, Inc., Massey Coal Services, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Omar Mining Company, Omar Mining Company, Omar Mining Company and others
Counter Defendant:
Daniel F. Fitzgibbon, Jr., Daniel F. Fitzgibbon, Jr., Daniel F. Fitzgibbon, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Fitzgibbon v. Massey Coal Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00020
Plaintiff:
Daniel F. Fitzgibbon, Jr. and Daniel F. Fitzgibbon, Jr.
Defendant:
Massey Coal Services, Inc., New Ridge Mining Company and Long Fork Coal Company
Counter Claimant:
New Ridge Mining Company, Long Fork Coal Company and Massey Coal Services, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Daniel F. Fitzgibbon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
