Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Mathis v. Mayo et al
as 3:2020cv00783
Defendant:
Officer William Mayo and Officer Curt Flynn
Plaintiff:
Danel T. Mathis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Mayo et al
as 3:2020cv00431
Plaintiff:
Danel Tawan Mathis, Jr.
Defendant:
William L. Mayo and Curt T. Flynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirkpatrick v. Mathis Battery Company, Inc.
as 5:2020cv00089
Plaintiff:
Ian Kirkpatrick
Defendant:
Mathis Battery Company, Inc. and Mathis Battery Company, Inc. doing business as Paducah Battery Supply
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00078
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Mathis v. Speedway LLC
as 6:2019cv00246
Defendant:
Speedway LLC
Plaintiff:
Bertha Mathis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Albers, et al v. The Medical Protective Co., Inc., et al
as 2:2019cv00088
Executor:
Stephen Carmen, Gordon Rister, Jodi Behrendt and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Rutter, Kelly Martin, Christina Rutter and others
Defendant:
Paul Vollman, Esq., Mike Lyon, Esq., Berkshire Hathaway and others
Petitioner:
West Chester Hospital, UC Health and West Chester Hospital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Mathis et al
as 6:2019cv00111
Defendant:
Carol Mathis, Darryl Mathis and Carol Robinson Mathis
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00061
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Mathis v. Inland Marine Service, Inc.
as 5:2018cv00079
Plaintiff:
Johnny Mathis
Defendant:
Inland Marine Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Poynter et al v. Allen et al
as 3:2016cv00784
Plaintiff:
James Paul Poynter and Westley Adam Mathis
Defendant:
Danny Allen, Hardin County Detention Center and Walter Hinote
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
