Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv15163
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATT ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniel Dydzak v. USA, et al
as 18-15673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, MATTHEW C. ROGERS, AKA Matt Rogers and others
Daniel Dydzak v. USA, et al
as 17-17401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, MATTHEW C. ROGERS, AKA Matt Rogers and others
Dydzak v. Chen et al
as 3:2017cv06843
Defendant:
Jeffrey L. Bleich, Carlos T. Bea, A. Wallace Tashima and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Dydzak
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Dydzak v. USDC-CASF
as 17-72962
:
In re: DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Petitioner:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, MATTHEW C. ROGERS, AKA Matt Rogers and others
Cody Baker, et al v. Masco Builder Cabinet Group
as 13-1120
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cody Baker, Robert I. Toland, Curtis W. Aby and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Masco Builder Cabinet Group, Inc., doing business as Merillat Industries
Cody Baker, et al v. Masco Builder Cabinet Group
as 13-1116
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Cody Baker, Robert I. Toland, Curtis W. Aby and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Masco Builder Cabinet Group, Inc., doing business as Merillat Industries
Rogers v. Integrity Cycles LLC
as 2:2012cv00600
Plaintiff:
Matt Rogers
Defendant:
Integrity Cycles LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Yen et al v. Vento Family trust et al
as 5:2008cv03535
Plaintiff:
Yu-Sze Yen, Yu-Sze Yen, Clarice Arne and others
Defendant:
Vento Family trust, Vento Investments , LLC, Guy Berry and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
