Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Walker v. Cash
as 1:2023cv01893
Plaintiff:
Matt Walker, IV
Defendant:
Detective Brandon Cash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Hill
as 1:2023cv01894
Plaintiff:
Matt Walker, IV
Defendant:
Victor Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Walker
as 1:2023cv01892
Plaintiff:
Matt Walker, IV
Defendant:
Rorieta Joy Walker and Judge Geronda V. Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Hill et al
as 1:2022cv04320
Plaintiff:
Matt Walker, IV
Defendant:
Victor Hill and Clayton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Walker et al
as 1:2022cv04319
Plaintiff:
Matt Walker, IV
Defendant:
Roreita Joy Walker, Willie Davis, Jr. and Clayton County Public Defender's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Cash et al
as 1:2022cv04318
Plaintiff:
Matt Walker, IV
Defendant:
Detective Brandon Cash and Clayton County Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TruGreen Companies, et al v. Mower Brothers, et al
as 13-4105
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TRUGREEN COMPANIES, a Delaware limited liability company and TRUGREEN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Delaware limited partnership
Defendant - Appellant:
KEVIN D. BITTON, DBA Scotts Lawn Service, KEVIN D BITTON, individually, JEAN ROBERT BABILIS and others
Scott et al v. Dutchman Manufacturing, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv08574
Plaintiff:
Shalam Scott, Shalam Scott, Michael Scott, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Dutchman Manufacturing, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
