Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Clements v. Secretary, Department of Corrections LEE
as 2:2024cv00294
Petitioner:
Louis Matthew Clements
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clements v. DeSantis et al
as 2:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Louis Matthew Clements
Defendant:
Ron DeSantis and FDLE, MARK GLASS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Clements v. State of Florida
as 2:2023cv00829
Petitioner:
Louis Matthew Clements
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CLEMENT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10892
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW CLEMENT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CLEMENTS v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
LOUIS MATTHEW CLEMENTS
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, ASHLEY MOODY, RICKY D DIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clements v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv00190
Plaintiff:
Louis Matthew Clements
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Secuirty Administration and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Clements v. The State of Florida
as 2:2020cv00398
Plaintiff:
Louis Matthew Clements
Defendant:
The State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clements v. Apax Partners LLP et al
as 2:2020cv00310
Defendant:
Apax Partners LLP, Attenti US. Inc., Mike Roman and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Matthew Clements
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clements v. Scott et al
as 2:2018cv00178
Plaintiff:
Louis Matthew Clements
Defendant:
Rick Scott, Pam Bondi and Stephen B. Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Clements v. State of Florida et al
as 2:2017cv00396
Petitioner:
Louis Matthew Clements
Respondent:
State of Florida and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
