Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Mohammed v. Durbin et al
as 1:2022cv06282
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Defendant:
Senator Dick Durbin, Senator Tammy Duckworth, U.S. Attorney John R. Lausch Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Mohammed v. Pallmeyer et al
as 1:2022cv05937
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Defendant:
Chief Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer, Chief Judge Diane Sykes, Clerk Thomas Bruton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Mohammed v. Pallmeyer et al
as 1:2022cv05786
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Defendant:
Chief Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer, Chief Judge Diane Sykes, Thomas Bruton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Taylor v. Ploden et al
as 1:2022cv01868
Plaintiff:
Kennado K. Taylor
Defendant:
Mr. Ploden, Mr. Barry, Judge Matthew F. Kennelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Peter Gakuba v. Iain Johnston
as 22-1531
Petitioner:
PETER GAKUBA
Respondent:
MATTHEW F. KENNELLY and IAIN D. JOHNSTON
Taylor v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv01608
Plaintiff:
Kennado K. Taylor
Defendant:
Tom Dart, John Doe, Sgt Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jared Stubblefield v. Matthew Kennelly
as 19-2533
Respondent:
MATTHEW F. KENNELLY
Petitioner:
JARED STUBBLEFIELD
Antonio Crawford v. Matthew Kennelly, et al
as 19-1841
Defendant / Appellee:
M. MURPHY, UNKNOWN, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General of the United States and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO D. CRAWFORD
Crawford v. Kennelly et al
as 1:2019cv00048
Defendant:
Unknown Warden Metropolitian Correctional Center, Unknown United States Marshal, Judge Matthew F. Kennelly and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edward Velazquez v. Matthew Kennelly
as 18-2838
Petitioner:
EDWARD R. VELAZQUEZ
Respondent:
MATTHEW F. KENNELLY
Party-in-Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
