Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Jairo Sanchez v. William Barr
as 19-1085
Petitioner:
JAIRO FERINO SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General and WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Elahi v. William Barr
as 19-1073
Petitioner:
AZHAR ELAHI
Respondent:
MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General and WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Martha Benitez-Vasquez v. William Barr
as 19-1072
Petitioner:
B.D.R.B. and MARTHA ISABEL BENITEZ-VASQUEZ
Respondent:
MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General and WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Felix Palacios Flores v. William Barr
as 19-1070
Petitioner:
FELIX PALACIOS FLORES
Respondent:
MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General and WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Mirna Artiga Carrero v. US
as 19-1066
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting U.S. Attorney General, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General and others
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER FARRELLY and BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIRNA RUBIDIA ARTIGA CARRERO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00122
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harold Pineda-Aguilar v. William Barr
as 19-1056
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General
Petitioner:
HAROLD PINEDA-AGUILAR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv00083
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1445
Julio Rosales-Beltran v. William P. Barr
as 19-1018
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General
Petitioner:
JULIO CESAR ROSALES-BELTRAN
Obioha v. Whitaker et al
as 8:2018cv04012
Defendant:
Acting Attorney Gene Matthew G. Whitaker, BRIAN STOKES, DR. STELLA ADAOBI OBIOHA and others
Plaintiff:
Stella Adaobi Obioha, MD
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
