Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jose Sillas, et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 22-55240
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSE SILLAS, MARIA SILLAS and MIGUEL SILLAS
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation
Defendant:
EDGAR MEJIA, MATTHEW MENDEZ, HAINER HERNANDEZ and others
MENDEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv06600
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MENDEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miguel Sillas et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2017cv08691
Defendant:
Vincenzo Averaimo, City of Los Angeles, DOES and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Sillas, Maria Sillas and Miguel Sillas
Lugardo v. Dart
as 1:2016cv08145
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mendez Lugardo
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. Lee, et al.
as 2:2016cv00477
Plaintiff:
Joseph Matthew Mendez
Defendant:
B. Lee, T. Murray and J. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lugardo v. Dart
as 1:2016cv02274
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mendez Lugardo
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendez v. Enecon Northeast Applied Polymer Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv06736
Defendant:
Michael Barr, Robert Barr and Enecon Northeast Applied Polymer Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mendez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mendez
as 1:2014cv06736
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mendez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Williams v. Fox
as 5:2013cv01280
Petitioner:
James Lee Williams, II
Respondent:
John B Fox, Charles E Samuels, Jr, J A Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Blum et al v. Internal Fixation Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv23137
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Blum , Bromson Investment LTD , Beauperthuy Enterprises and others
Defendant:
Internal Fixation Systems, Inc. , Stephen J. Dresnick , Jay Higgins and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
