Civil Rights Cases
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04450
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Thomas et al v. Ortiz et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv07513
Plaintiff: Tevon Thomas, Dwyte Pilgrim, Alishea Walters and others
Defendant: Alfredo Skelton, Joebian Ortiz, City of New York and others
Petitioner: Michael Lumer
Not Classified By Court: Hon. (Ret.) Kathleen Anne Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv00669
Plaintiff: Joshua Bryant and Matthew Nelson
Defendant: City of New York, John Does 1-5 and Florin Kuka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv00519
Defendant: City of New York, John Does 1-7 and Anthony Sheridan
Plaintiff: Shaquille Lisle and Matthew Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00631
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Le et al v. Escondido, City of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv02241
Plaintiff: Van Dinh Le , Amy Thu Bich Le , Kevin Le and others
Defendant: Escondido, City of, Jim Maher, Matthew Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kiernan v. Hermes International et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01508
Plaintiff: Walter Kiernan
Defendant: Hermes International, Hermes International Corporation, Hermes International Corporation France and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pinto v. The Village of Romeoville Illinois et al
as 1:2009cv01612
Plaintiff: Juan Carlos Pinto
Defendant: The Village of Romeoville Illinois, Andrew Barto and Matthew Nelson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?