Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jenkins v. Emm et al
as 3:2023cv01984
Plaintiff:
Matthew P. Jenkins
Defendant:
Ronald F. Emm and All Chemical Transport Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DEC v. BUTLER COUNTY et al
as 2:2023cv01957
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW P. DEC
Defendant:
BUTLER COUNTY, BUTLER COUNTY PROBATION, BUTLER COUNTY PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kovalchuk et al v. Smith
as 1:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
Maxim Kovalchuk and Julia Kovalchuk
Defendant:
Hon. Matthew P. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TYSON v. DUFFY et al
as 2:2023cv01676
Plaintiff:
TIA TYSON
Defendant:
SHAUN DUFFY and MATTHEW P LALLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEC v. BUTLER PA. COMMISSIONER AND SOLICITOR et al
as 2:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW P. DEC
Defendant:
BUTLER PA. COMMISSIONER AND SOLICITOR, BUTLER PA. DISTRICT ATTORNEY and ATT. BENJAMIN LEVINNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
DEC v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2022cv01290
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW P. DEC and Matthew Paul Dec, I
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENN DOT, PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHITFIELD v. TREMONT MORTGAGE TRUST et al
as 2:2021cv03970
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
TREMONT MORTGAGE TRUST, JOHN L HARRINGTON, MATTHEW P JORDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
BAKER v. PRA HEALTH SCIENCES, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02463
Plaintiff:
LEWIS D BAKER
Defendant:
INDIGO MERGER SUB, INC., COLIN SHANNON, ALEXANDER G. DICKINSON and others
WRIGHT-JOHNSON v. HOUCK
as 5:2021cv00285
Plaintiff:
TERESA WRIGHT-JOHNSON
Defendant:
MATTHEW P. HOUCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
