Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Borchgrevink, et al v. Harris County, Texas et al
as 4:2023cv03198
Plaintiff:
Sarah Borchgrevink, Rep of the Estate of Matthew Shelton, Marianna Thomson, statutory wrongfule death beneficiary of Matthew Shelton, Sarah Borchgrevink and others
Defendant:
Harris County, Texas, Harris County Hospital District d/b/a Harris Health System and Harris County Hospital District doing business as Harris Health Systems
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2023cv03197
Plaintiff:
Sarah, Rep of the Estate of Matthew Shelton Borchgrevink, Marianna Ruth Thomson and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Harris County, Texas and Harris County Hospital District d/b/a Harris Health System
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
James Shelton v. USA
as 20-5474
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES MATTHEW SHELTON
In re: James Shelton
as 20-5200
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES MATTHEW SHELTON
James Shelton v. USA
as 19-5025
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES MATTHEW SHELTON
Shelton v. USA
as 5:2018cv00464
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Matthew Shelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Shelton v. No Named Respondents
as 1:2017cv02131
Petitioner:
Matthew Shelton
Respondent:
No Named Respondents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA v. James Shelton
as 17-5090
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES MATTHEW SHELTON
Jones v. Fleming et al
as 3:2013cv50238
Plaintiff:
Leonard L. Jones
Defendant:
Ryan Fleming, D'Evyron Boone and Matthew Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jones v. Fleming et al
as 3:2013cv50170
Plaintiff:
Leonard L. Jones
Defendant:
Ryan Fleming, D'Evyron Boone and Matthew Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
