Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Isaacson et al v. Brnovich et al
as 2:2021cv01417
Plaintiff:
Paul A Isaacson, Eric M Reuss, National Council of Jewish Women (Arizona Section) Incorporated and others
Defendant:
Mark Brnovich, Michael Whiting, Brian McIntyre and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Sharing Down Syndrome Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Parks v. Dean et al
as 3:2016cv08298
Plaintiff:
Edward F Parks
Defendant:
Sandra Dean, Mohave, County of, Matthew Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beaver v. Ducey et al
as 3:2016cv08225
Plaintiff:
Aaron Sheldon Beaver
Defendant:
Doug Ducey, John Taylor, Troy Anhalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Smith et al
as 3:2016cv08222
Plaintiff:
Edward F Parks
Defendant:
Matthew Smith and Mohave County Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Smith et al
as 3:2016cv08218
Plaintiff:
Edward F Parks
Defendant:
Matthew Smith, James Zack, S McCleary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parks v. Johnson et al
as 4:2016cv00083
Plaintiff:
Edward F Parks
Defendant:
Christy Denise Johnson, Neil Robert Taylor, Bull Head Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv00217
Plaintiff:
Matthew Smith
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tracy v. Zack et al
as 3:2015cv08240
Plaintiff:
Todd Sterling Tracy
Defendant:
James Zack and Matthew Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fox v. Mohave, County of et al
as 3:2012cv08006
Plaintiff:
Shayne Robert Fox
Defendant:
Mohave, County of, Matthew Smith, Lake Havasu City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doty v. Mohave, County of et al
as 3:2012cv08002
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lynn Doty
Defendant:
Mohave, County of, Matthew Smith, Mohave County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
