Cases 1 - 10 of 882
BOGGS v. HOLMES et al
as 1:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BOGGS
Defendant:
CHASE HOLMES, JASON MYERS, TRAVIS KEMPTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Stewart v. Surma et al
as 1:2024cv03683
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Stewart
Defendant:
Samantha C. Surma, Matthew J. Wagner and The City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watkins v. South Suburban Major Crimes Task Force et al
as 1:2024cv03555
Plaintiff:
Timothy Watkins
Defendant:
South Suburban Major Crimes Task Force, Village of Burnham, City of Oak Forest and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03215
Plaintiff:
Darien Harris
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Devinn Jones, Isaac Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andy Williams, Jr. v. City of Aurora, Illinois, et al
as 24-1635
Plaintiff:
ANDY H. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
CITY OF AURORA, ILLINOIS, MAYOR RICHARD IRVIN AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF AURORA, KRISTEN ZIMAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Matthew Peterson v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 24-1585
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW PETERSON
Defendant:
THOMAS J. DART, DARRYL HOUSTON, HUGH WALSH and others
WATSON v. BINFORD
as 1:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
JAMES WATSON
Defendant:
MATTHEW BINFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LAUDERDALE v. DELAWARE COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
LAMONE LAUDERDALE
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY, TONY SKINNER, SHERIFF, CANTEEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
